📸Неочевидное рядом: история глазами медиаклассников
«Медиафакт» — проект юных рилсмейкеров, которые находят редкие исторические факты об известных персоналиях и современно их подают: тренды, емко выстроенный сюжет, динамика. Ребята гарантируют, что вы узнаете что-то новое.
📸Неочевидное рядом: история глазами медиаклассников
«Медиафакт» — проект юных рилсмейкеров, которые находят редкие исторические факты об известных персоналиях и современно их подают: тренды, емко выстроенный сюжет, динамика. Ребята гарантируют, что вы узнаете что-то новое.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a video message on Tuesday that Ukrainian forces "destroy the invaders wherever we can." The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from sg
