Warning: file_put_contents(aCache/aDaily/post/depobr_mos/-18436-18437-18438-18439-18440-18441-18442-18443-18444-17141?single" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="return confirm('Open this link?\n\n'+this.href);">«Медиафакта».</a><br/><br/>Какой брелок носил с собой Чехов? Правда ли, что герои некоторых рассказов писались с собак? И почему его в детстве называли бомбой? <br/><br/>Видео подготовили ученики московской <a href="https://t.me/school1694uzao" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="return confirm('Open this link?\n\n'+this.href);">школы № 1694 им. П. М. Фитина</a> вместе севастопольской творческо-экспериментальной студией телевидения <a href="https://vk.com/test_school_23" target="_blank" rel="noopener" onclick="return confirm('Open this link?\n\n'+this.href);">школы № 23 им. Б. А. Кучера.</a><br/><br/><i>А интересные факты об Александре Блоке смотрите </i><a href="https://t.me/depobr_mos/17447-18436-): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Московское образование | Telegram Webview: depobr_mos/18437 -
Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform.
from sg