Simondon|Симондон

О Франсуа Ларюэле оставила воспоминания Анн Фаго-Ларжо (р. 1938), авторитетный философ в области биоэтики, член Французской академии наук. В 1966–1967 гг. она была ассистентом профессора Симондона в Сорбонне, а потом училась в Стэнфорде и вернулась на родину с PhD. С Ларюэлем пересекалась в Нантере, где в 1986 г. защитила докторскую (doctorat ès lettres et sciences humaines). В 2006 г. в интервью (опубл. в переводе с фр.яз.):
Thierry Bardini: Bernard Stiegler spoke to me about the role of François Laruelle in helping to re-edit Simondon’s books...
Anne Fagot-Largeault: Yes, Laruelle was very important for that work... but I am not sure if Laruelle knew Simondon personally. He was very interested in Simondon; he could sense Simondon’s genius. I knew Laruelle because I taught at Nanterre at the same time as him. Laruelle was also someone who was a little strange, but in a different way from Simondon. Laruelle is a very nice person, and an excellent teacher who can teach very normal courses, in the history of philosophy for example. When Laruelle was being Laruelle (because Laruelle could also be non-Laruelle, at which point one could understand him very well indeed), but when he was being Laruelle, he had a private language, where the words did not have the same meanings they did in ordinary language. Now he has his followers who have taught themselves this vocabulary, and who are capable of listening to him and perhaps even speak to him.
TB: Seen from the outside, isn’t that a somewhat Parisian thing to do? This development of a language restricted to the school...
AFL: No, Laruelle was not a Parisian phenomenon. Laruelle was not a fashionable phenomenon. Laruelle was a phenomenon of a revolt against the humdrum philosophy taught at the university. He made several attempts to shake the philosophical world and I sympathized with these attempts, my husband too, at one time, because it is true that the teaching of philosophy was too timid, too concentrated on the history of philosophy, too little creative. When Laruelle launched the first of his little manifestoes, both of us subscribed immediately and we were happy to receive them, because they were really shaking the tree! But I think Laruelle enclosed himself in his linguistic ghetto which finally did not allow him to shake the tree of philosophy, because he had placed himself on the sidelines, on the margins of the philosophical community.
(Theory Culture Society. 2014. 31:141)

www.group-telegram.com/sg/gilbertsimondon.com/471

1.0K viewsOct 31, 2024 at 16:11

О Франсуа Ларюэле оставила воспоминания Анн Фаго-Ларжо (р. 1938), авторитетный философ в области биоэтики, член Французской академии наук. В 1966–1967 гг. она была ассистентом профессора Симондона в Сорбонне, а потом училась в Стэнфорде и вернулась на родину с PhD. С Ларюэлем пересекалась в Нантере, где в 1986 г. защитила докторскую (doctorat ès lettres et sciences humaines). В 2006 г. в интервью (опубл. в переводе с фр.яз.):
Thierry Bardini: Bernard Stiegler spoke to me about the role of François Laruelle in helping to re-edit Simondon’s books...
Anne Fagot-Largeault: Yes, Laruelle was very important for that work... but I am not sure if Laruelle knew Simondon personally. He was very interested in Simondon; he could sense Simondon’s genius. I knew Laruelle because I taught at Nanterre at the same time as him. Laruelle was also someone who was a little strange, but in a different way from Simondon. Laruelle is a very nice person, and an excellent teacher who can teach very normal courses, in the history of philosophy for example. When Laruelle was being Laruelle (because Laruelle could also be non-Laruelle, at which point one could understand him very well indeed), but when he was being Laruelle, he had a private language, where the words did not have the same meanings they did in ordinary language. Now he has his followers who have taught themselves this vocabulary, and who are capable of listening to him and perhaps even speak to him.
TB: Seen from the outside, isn’t that a somewhat Parisian thing to do? This development of a language restricted to the school...
AFL: No, Laruelle was not a Parisian phenomenon. Laruelle was not a fashionable phenomenon. Laruelle was a phenomenon of a revolt against the humdrum philosophy taught at the university. He made several attempts to shake the philosophical world and I sympathized with these attempts, my husband too, at one time, because it is true that the teaching of philosophy was too timid, too concentrated on the history of philosophy, too little creative. When Laruelle launched the first of his little manifestoes, both of us subscribed immediately and we were happy to receive them, because they were really shaking the tree! But I think Laruelle enclosed himself in his linguistic ghetto which finally did not allow him to shake the tree of philosophy, because he had placed himself on the sidelines, on the margins of the philosophical community.
(Theory Culture Society. 2014. 31:141)

BY Simondon|Симондон