Довольно ожидаемая ситуация: те конфликты, которые дают Кремлю надежду на переключение внимания Запада с украинского направления на другие, будь то Закавказье или Ближний Восток, на самом деле раскалывают единство российских политических элит, что выражается через ассоциированных ЛОМов. И если телевизионное армянство согласилось со сдачей Нагорного Карабаха Азербайджану, то политическое еврейство оказалось более патриотичным.
Довольно ожидаемая ситуация: те конфликты, которые дают Кремлю надежду на переключение внимания Запада с украинского направления на другие, будь то Закавказье или Ближний Восток, на самом деле раскалывают единство российских политических элит, что выражается через ассоциированных ЛОМов. И если телевизионное армянство согласилось со сдачей Нагорного Карабаха Азербайджану, то политическое еврейство оказалось более патриотичным.
BY Наивная политология
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. "He has kind of an old-school cyber-libertarian world view where technology is there to set you free," Maréchal said. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy."
from sg
