⚠️⚠️⚠️ Залишилось всього біля 2-х тисяч, тому у вас єостанній шанс заскочити в цей розіграш. І вже сьогодні ввечері ми закриємо банку і розіграємо вініл!
Головна ціль на EcoFlow вже закрита, але те що збираємо піде на наступний запит. ЩИТ просить для своєї групи електроквадроцикл SN-EA34 8000W 72V для евакуації поранених, який коштує під 200 000грн. Попередній кацапи знищили дроном.
⚠️⚠️⚠️ Залишилось всього біля 2-х тисяч, тому у вас єостанній шанс заскочити в цей розіграш. І вже сьогодні ввечері ми закриємо банку і розіграємо вініл!
Головна ціль на EcoFlow вже закрита, але те що збираємо піде на наступний запит. ЩИТ просить для своєї групи електроквадроцикл SN-EA34 8000W 72V для евакуації поранених, який коштує під 200 000грн. Попередній кацапи знищили дроном.
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app.
from sg
