Этот ментор был навсегда забанен в сообществе за: 1) Обман учеников 2) Копирование материалов других менторов и выдавание за свои 3) Неумение/нежелание признавать свои косяки, надежду выехать на гнилом пиздеже после получения прямого вопроса "было? Признайся и будем обсуждать"
Ментор навсегда забанен в таблице и в сообществе. Возможно создаст фейк, приложил фото. Не работайте с ним.
Напоминаю, что если вас обманули, оказали некачественные услуги, нужно разбираться! Пишите в @m0rtymerr_support, присылайте пруфы, мы во всем разберемся.
Этот ментор был навсегда забанен в сообществе за: 1) Обман учеников 2) Копирование материалов других менторов и выдавание за свои 3) Неумение/нежелание признавать свои косяки, надежду выехать на гнилом пиздеже после получения прямого вопроса "было? Признайся и будем обсуждать"
Ментор навсегда забанен в таблице и в сообществе. Возможно создаст фейк, приложил фото. Не работайте с ним.
Напоминаю, что если вас обманули, оказали некачественные услуги, нужно разбираться! Пишите в @m0rtymerr_support, присылайте пруфы, мы во всем разберемся.
As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has been a driving force in markets for the past few weeks. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. "We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said.
from sg
