Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 6943 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Возбужденная Коми | Telegram Webview: komi_7x7/4005 -
Владимир Уйба назначен первым замначальника Главного военно-медицинского управления Минобороны РФ
О своем уходе с поста главы Коми Уйба сообщил 5 ноября. В обращении он также добавил, что президент ему «доверил новый фронт работы на федеральном уровне».
Владимир Уйба назначен первым замначальника Главного военно-медицинского управления Минобороны РФ
О своем уходе с поста главы Коми Уйба сообщил 5 ноября. В обращении он также добавил, что президент ему «доверил новый фронт работы на федеральном уровне».
BY Возбужденная Коми
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from sg