🚩Бойцы СВО из 52-ой артиллерийской бригады ВДВ поблагодарили члена Краснодарского краевого комитета КПРФ Романа Поливоду за оказанную им помощь в приобретении снаряжения, экипировки и средств наблюдения.
Военнослужащие отметили, что всё это помогает выполнять задачи на территории столкновений с украинскими неонацистами. Враг будет повержен, а Россия – победит! - уверены бойцы.
🚩Бойцы СВО из 52-ой артиллерийской бригады ВДВ поблагодарили члена Краснодарского краевого комитета КПРФ Романа Поливоду за оказанную им помощь в приобретении снаряжения, экипировки и средств наблюдения.
Военнослужащие отметили, что всё это помогает выполнять задачи на территории столкновений с украинскими неонацистами. Враг будет повержен, а Россия – победит! - уверены бойцы.
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read."
from sg