Друзья, я решил, что каналу пора менять название. Всё-таки пишу я не только об образовании, тем более теперь, когда не связан с факультетом права Вышки. Вот, про сериалы написал))
Спасибо Ване Хамидуллину за отличную формулировку! Скоро в канале появятся и другие анонсы — все так же, вокруг права, но не только о нем. :)
Друзья, я решил, что каналу пора менять название. Всё-таки пишу я не только об образовании, тем более теперь, когда не связан с факультетом права Вышки. Вот, про сериалы написал))
Спасибо Ване Хамидуллину за отличную формулировку! Скоро в канале появятся и другие анонсы — все так же, вокруг права, но не только о нем. :)
BY Форма права • Роман Янковский
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from sg