Je vous invite à lire ma dernière interview d'Amandina Boßdorf, directrice de Lukreta.
Lukreta, équivalent de Némésis, est une association composée de femmes dédiée à la protection des femmes européennes. Leur mission vise à défendre les droits et la sécurité des femmes face aux menaces contemporaines.
Nous parlons de son engagement politique, de son rapport au féminisme, de la lutte contre les violences faites aux femmes, de l'immigration et de la nécessité de construire une entraide européenne (Vorfeld).
Je vous invite à lire ma dernière interview d'Amandina Boßdorf, directrice de Lukreta.
Lukreta, équivalent de Némésis, est une association composée de femmes dédiée à la protection des femmes européennes. Leur mission vise à défendre les droits et la sécurité des femmes face aux menaces contemporaines.
Nous parlons de son engagement politique, de son rapport au féminisme, de la lutte contre les violences faites aux femmes, de l'immigration et de la nécessité de construire une entraide européenne (Vorfeld).
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp.
from sg
