В Нижневартовск, где уже много лет не могут достроить больницу, регулярно срывая сроки сдачи, съездил замгубернатора Андрей Зобницев. Он провел совещание с подрядчиками и пригрозил им, что теперь все расскажет губернатору. «Я лично теперь знаю реальное положение дел на объекте и доложу об этом Наталье Комаровой», — заявил Зобницев.
В Нижневартовск, где уже много лет не могут достроить больницу, регулярно срывая сроки сдачи, съездил замгубернатора Андрей Зобницев. Он провел совещание с подрядчиками и пригрозил им, что теперь все расскажет губернатору. «Я лично теперь знаю реальное положение дел на объекте и доложу об этом Наталье Комаровой», — заявил Зобницев.
The regulator took order for the search and seizure operation from Judge Purushottam B Jadhav, Sebi Special Judge / Additional Sessions Judge. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from sg
