Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 4273 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 4096 of 8369 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Михаил Матвеев коммент | Telegram Webview: matveevkomment/7435 -
Посмотрите еще один батл сегодняшнего заседания Госдумы. Законопроект Михаила Делягина об ограничении 5% труда мигрантов. Ему оппонирует Артем Туров (Единая Россия), выступили в поддержку Михаил Матвеев, Оксана Дмитриева. Законопроект разумеется не прошёл. https://youtu.be/GZNem_B7hXU
Посмотрите еще один батл сегодняшнего заседания Госдумы. Законопроект Михаила Делягина об ограничении 5% труда мигрантов. Ему оппонирует Артем Туров (Единая Россия), выступили в поддержку Михаил Матвеев, Оксана Дмитриева. Законопроект разумеется не прошёл. https://youtu.be/GZNem_B7hXU
"And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
from sg