Неделю назад я вам не показала нашу ротацию, потому что она ребенку совершенно не зашла 😃
Чем занимался Матвей:
⚪️бОльшую часть времени занимала свободная игра 🔹лего 🔹сюжетно-ролевая игра (на видео Матвей варит свой суп, а потом кормит им нашу собаку😂 Не переживайте, суп доваренный и съедобный)
Неделю назад я вам не показала нашу ротацию, потому что она ребенку совершенно не зашла 😃
Чем занимался Матвей:
⚪️бОльшую часть времени занимала свободная игра 🔹лего 🔹сюжетно-ролевая игра (на видео Матвей варит свой суп, а потом кормит им нашу собаку😂 Не переживайте, суп доваренный и съедобный)
In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read."
from sg
