Думал, Иван Кляйн подрежет особо острые моменты интервью. Но он всё сохранил. Три года он вёл борьбу за свое честное имя. И что бы там ни писали в пресс-релизах, он эту борьбу выиграл. Не без тяжелых потерь, конечно. Но теперь я точно знаю, за одного битого мэра трех небитых дают. #Интервью_Кляйн https://telegra.ph/Ivan-Klyajn-YA-by-vse-ravno-poshel-v-mehry-06-22
Думал, Иван Кляйн подрежет особо острые моменты интервью. Но он всё сохранил. Три года он вёл борьбу за свое честное имя. И что бы там ни писали в пресс-релизах, он эту борьбу выиграл. Не без тяжелых потерь, конечно. Но теперь я точно знаю, за одного битого мэра трех небитых дают. #Интервью_Кляйн https://telegra.ph/Ivan-Klyajn-YA-by-vse-ravno-poshel-v-mehry-06-22
"There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. The fake Zelenskiy account reached 20,000 followers on Telegram before it was shut down, a remedial action that experts say is all too rare. "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from sg
