Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 15201 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 БЛОКНОТ ФИЛОСОФА | Telegram Webview: philosnote/3661 -
📌Переписка, охватывающая 25 лет, — это не только ода чувствам, но и глубокий философский диалог, отражающий сложные и полные противоречий отношения двух знаковых фигур в области философии XX века.
📌 В карточках выделили фрагменты из писем, посвящённых любви. Первая часть цитат из переписки Арендт и Хайдеггера — здесь.
✏️ Материал подготовлен на основе перевода по третьему изданию 2002 года, вышедшего в Издательстве Института Гайдара под руководством В.В. Анашвили.
📌Переписка, охватывающая 25 лет, — это не только ода чувствам, но и глубокий философский диалог, отражающий сложные и полные противоречий отношения двух знаковых фигур в области философии XX века.
📌 В карточках выделили фрагменты из писем, посвящённых любви. Первая часть цитат из переписки Арендт и Хайдеггера — здесь.
✏️ Материал подготовлен на основе перевода по третьему изданию 2002 года, вышедшего в Издательстве Института Гайдара под руководством В.В. Анашвили.
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from sg