Прокуратура РФ пересмотрит решение «О реабилитации жертв политических репрессий»
В ведомстве заявили о пересмотре решения о реабилитации на основании закона 1991 года, если они «касались пособников нацистов, изменников Родины, лиц, виновных в совершении тяжких и особо тяжких преступлений, военных преступлений, преступлений против мира и человечности».
Прокуратура РФ пересмотрит решение «О реабилитации жертв политических репрессий»
В ведомстве заявили о пересмотре решения о реабилитации на основании закона 1991 года, если они «касались пособников нацистов, изменников Родины, лиц, виновных в совершении тяжких и особо тяжких преступлений, военных преступлений, преступлений против мира и человечности».
But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. The channel appears to be part of the broader information war that has developed following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The Kremlin has paid Russian TikTok influencers to push propaganda, according to a Vice News investigation, while ProPublica found that fake Russian fact check videos had been viewed over a million times on Telegram. Artem Kliuchnikov and his family fled Ukraine just days before the Russian invasion. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from sg
