1 марта 1920 г. к власти в Венгрии, где незадолго до того румынские интервенты свергли Советскую республику, пришёл Миклош Хорти. Пару лет назад я писал о нём серию постов. Сейчас же я свёл их в одну статью. Наслаждайтесь.
Эта статья размещена в открытом доступе. Материалы для премиум-подписчиков вы можете прочитать на Boosty или на Patreon.
1 марта 1920 г. к власти в Венгрии, где незадолго до того румынские интервенты свергли Советскую республику, пришёл Миклош Хорти. Пару лет назад я писал о нём серию постов. Сейчас же я свёл их в одну статью. Наслаждайтесь.
Эта статья размещена в открытом доступе. Материалы для премиум-подписчиков вы можете прочитать на Boosty или на Patreon.
For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted.
from sg
