Коллеги наперебой пишут об украинском следе убийства генерала Кириллова. Я бы брал выше.
Он занимался развенчанием действий даже не Украины, а США. Он указывал на то, как американцы опутали подбрюшье России сетью лабораторий, и готовы ни на чём не останавливаться. Сведения, излагаемые Кирилловым, прямо угрожали репутации США в мире.
Думаю, что в данном случае не Британия. Именно США, ЦРУ. МИ6, ГУР и СБУ могли играть роль "прокладок". А исполнить могли и мигранты из Средней Азии и Закавказья, и заукраинцы, и просто уголовники.
Коллеги наперебой пишут об украинском следе убийства генерала Кириллова. Я бы брал выше.
Он занимался развенчанием действий даже не Украины, а США. Он указывал на то, как американцы опутали подбрюшье России сетью лабораторий, и готовы ни на чём не останавливаться. Сведения, излагаемые Кирилловым, прямо угрожали репутации США в мире.
Думаю, что в данном случае не Британия. Именно США, ЦРУ. МИ6, ГУР и СБУ могли играть роль "прокладок". А исполнить могли и мигранты из Средней Азии и Закавказья, и заукраинцы, и просто уголовники.
The regulator said it has been undertaking several campaigns to educate the investors to be vigilant while taking investment decisions based on stock tips. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights.
from sg
