⚡️В Москве вынесен приговор в отношении виновного в убийстве трех человек в 2011 году
Собранные Первым управлением по расследованию особо важных дел (о преступлениях против личности и общественной безопасности) Главного следственного управления Следственного комитета Российской Федерации по городу Москве доказательства признаны судом достаточными для вынесения приговора в отношении мужчины, виновного в совершении преступления, предусмотренного пп. «а», «к» ч. 2 ст. 105 УК РФ (убийство).
Приговором суда ему назначено наказание в виде 22 лет лишения свободы с отбыванием в колонии строгого режима.
⚡️В Москве вынесен приговор в отношении виновного в убийстве трех человек в 2011 году
Собранные Первым управлением по расследованию особо важных дел (о преступлениях против личности и общественной безопасности) Главного следственного управления Следственного комитета Российской Федерации по городу Москве доказательства признаны судом достаточными для вынесения приговора в отношении мужчины, виновного в совершении преступления, предусмотренного пп. «а», «к» ч. 2 ст. 105 УК РФ (убийство).
Приговором суда ему назначено наказание в виде 22 лет лишения свободы с отбыванием в колонии строгого режима.
BY Столичный СК
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. "He has kind of an old-school cyber-libertarian world view where technology is there to set you free," Maréchal said. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform.
from us
