Er war es, der bei der gestrigen Landtagssitzung die Mikrofone offen gelassen hat, so dass jeder nach Lust und Laune dazwischenquatschen konnte.
Das hat es seit 1949 in keinem deutschen Parlament gegeben. Doch damit wurde überhaupt erst die Grundlage für das Chaos gelegt, dass CDU, BSW, LINKE und SPD gestern anrichten konnten.
Er war es, der bei der gestrigen Landtagssitzung die Mikrofone offen gelassen hat, so dass jeder nach Lust und Laune dazwischenquatschen konnte.
Das hat es seit 1949 in keinem deutschen Parlament gegeben. Doch damit wurde überhaupt erst die Grundlage für das Chaos gelegt, dass CDU, BSW, LINKE und SPD gestern anrichten konnten.
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. In the past, it was noticed that through bulk SMSes, investors were induced to invest in or purchase the stocks of certain listed companies. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp.
from us
