Тренд на сказки набирает обороты. На Винзаводе прямо сейчас проходит выставка «ЖИЛИ-БЫЛИ: школа русской сказки», тут вам и дно морское, и лес сказочный, и стойло с Коньком-Горбунком и иллюстрации дивные, всего и не перечислишь. Экспозиция масштабная, обошла за два часа, сохранила себе в заметки почитать «битву грибов» и «Сказки Гамаюн» от Бумкниги. Выставка продлится до 31 марта, загляните, если хотите отсыпать себе чуда.
Тренд на сказки набирает обороты. На Винзаводе прямо сейчас проходит выставка «ЖИЛИ-БЫЛИ: школа русской сказки», тут вам и дно морское, и лес сказочный, и стойло с Коньком-Горбунком и иллюстрации дивные, всего и не перечислишь. Экспозиция масштабная, обошла за два часа, сохранила себе в заметки почитать «битву грибов» и «Сказки Гамаюн» от Бумкниги. Выставка продлится до 31 марта, загляните, если хотите отсыпать себе чуда.
But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford.
from us
