✨Так, а где счетоводы джипов в буханках? Куда делись наблюдатели за китайским электрокаром Алёхина? Что там с призывами по финансовой проверке? А как же изучение американских интернет-джипов на закладки?
А, это ж не сраного блогера пинать, а варежку на Кадырова открыть, это другое.
✨⭐️Как мем Кибертрак на фронте - прикольно, но чёрт его знает, где для него электрозаправку искать.
✨Так, а где счетоводы джипов в буханках? Куда делись наблюдатели за китайским электрокаром Алёхина? Что там с призывами по финансовой проверке? А как же изучение американских интернет-джипов на закладки?
А, это ж не сраного блогера пинать, а варежку на Кадырова открыть, это другое.
✨⭐️Как мем Кибертрак на фронте - прикольно, но чёрт его знает, где для него электрозаправку искать.
Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from tr