Вячеслав Андреевич! Я Вас поздравляю. Вы передовик в Самарской губернии. Не прошло и полгода, как Вам уже посвящают песни.
Спойлер: поверьте, это очень тревожный сигнал. И вообще, ваше поведение перед людьми губернии, это какой-то зашквар. Не такой Новый год они ждали и не таких подарков)
Вячеслав Андреевич! Я Вас поздравляю. Вы передовик в Самарской губернии. Не прошло и полгода, как Вам уже посвящают песни.
Спойлер: поверьте, это очень тревожный сигнал. И вообще, ваше поведение перед людьми губернии, это какой-то зашквар. Не такой Новый год они ждали и не таких подарков)
BY Вячеслав Федорищев
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. On Telegram’s website, it says that Pavel Durov “supports Telegram financially and ideologically while Nikolai (Duvov)’s input is technological.” Currently, the Telegram team is based in Dubai, having moved around from Berlin, London and Singapore after departing Russia. Meanwhile, the company which owns Telegram is registered in the British Virgin Islands. Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from tr
