Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 7478 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 ПолитБрокер | Telegram Webview: PolitBroker/15545 -
Акции вверх 🔝 Артамонов И.Г., Липецкая область 🔝 Гладков В.В., Белгородская область 🔝 Кобзев И.И., Иркутская область 🔝 Махонин Д.Н., Пермский край 🔝 Цыденов А.С., Бурятия
Акции вверх 🔝 Артамонов И.Г., Липецкая область 🔝 Гладков В.В., Белгородская область 🔝 Кобзев И.И., Иркутская область 🔝 Махонин Д.Н., Пермский край 🔝 Цыденов А.С., Бурятия
BY ПолитБрокер
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, an account on the Telegram messaging platform posing as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged his armed forces to surrender. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy."
from tr
