Анисимова как была дурой, так похоже и в гроб ляжет с этим недугом. Сначала пиздит налево - направо, а потом доступ в канал тому, на кого наехала закрывает...Ну и там конечно консультантом у неё новосибирский алкаш - историк выступает...Игорь Козлов со своим "Сибиряком". Дрим тим, ёпта...
Анисимова как была дурой, так похоже и в гроб ляжет с этим недугом. Сначала пиздит налево - направо, а потом доступ в канал тому, на кого наехала закрывает...Ну и там конечно консультантом у неё новосибирский алкаш - историк выступает...Игорь Козлов со своим "Сибиряком". Дрим тим, ёпта...
"There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. He adds: "Telegram has become my primary news source." Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from tr
