Вы старше 18 лет и живете в Челябинской области? 📋 Нам важно ваше мнение!
📍 Пройдите анонимный опрос — мы проводим его в рамках подготовки ежегодного доклада «О состоянии гражданского общества в Челябинской области в 2024 году».
Вы старше 18 лет и живете в Челябинской области? 📋 Нам важно ваше мнение!
📍 Пройдите анонимный опрос — мы проводим его в рамках подготовки ежегодного доклада «О состоянии гражданского общества в Челябинской области в 2024 году».
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. Telegram does offer end-to-end encrypted communications through Secret Chats, but this is not the default setting. Standard conversations use the MTProto method, enabling server-client encryption but with them stored on the server for ease-of-access. This makes using Telegram across multiple devices simple, but also means that the regular Telegram chats you’re having with folks are not as secure as you may believe.
from tr
