А так, стране хочешь не хочешь, но придется генерировать внутренний, читай, контролируемый правый «разворот», дабы не давать влиять подобным идеями «извне» на стремительно растущие (геометрическая прогрессия) массы недовольных национальной политикой Российской Федерации.
Уже в самое ближайшее время Джоны активизируют стимуляцию правых настроений в ру. сети.
Собственно, в Европе они уже их качают. Причем по полной программе.
А так, стране хочешь не хочешь, но придется генерировать внутренний, читай, контролируемый правый «разворот», дабы не давать влиять подобным идеями «извне» на стремительно растущие (геометрическая прогрессия) массы недовольных национальной политикой Российской Федерации.
Уже в самое ближайшее время Джоны активизируют стимуляцию правых настроений в ру. сети.
Собственно, в Европе они уже их качают. Причем по полной программе.
BY БОЛЬШОЙ ТРАНСФЕР
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. In December 2021, Sebi officials had conducted a search and seizure operation at the premises of certain persons carrying out similar manipulative activities through Telegram channels. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from tr
