Политика "не беспокоить общество" в чем-то разумна и имеет свои плюсы. Но только если враг тоже настроен ваше общество не беспокоить. Ждать такого от врага немного странно, особенно если враг не имеет никаких моральных тормозов и начинает выдыхаться. Разумно ли давать врагу полный карт-бланш на то, чтобы беспокоить общество?
Политика "не беспокоить общество" в чем-то разумна и имеет свои плюсы. Но только если враг тоже настроен ваше общество не беспокоить. Ждать такого от врага немного странно, особенно если враг не имеет никаких моральных тормозов и начинает выдыхаться. Разумно ли давать врагу полный карт-бланш на то, чтобы беспокоить общество?
BY Орден Феникса
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. READ MORE Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. Telegram Messenger Blocks Navalny Bot During Russian Election
from tr
