Кого-то одно упоминание рукоделия вводит в кризис (спасибо флешбэкам с уроков труда), а вот нашему коллеге Илье Григорьеву оно помогает соблюдать тот самый ✨work-life balance✨
Немного электрик, немного столяр, немного сварщик — подробнее о хобби Ильи читайте в карточках!
Кого-то одно упоминание рукоделия вводит в кризис (спасибо флешбэкам с уроков труда), а вот нашему коллеге Илье Григорьеву оно помогает соблюдать тот самый ✨work-life balance✨
Немного электрик, немного столяр, немного сварщик — подробнее о хобби Ильи читайте в карточках!
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever."
from tr
