Криптотрейдер под псевдонимом qklpjeth потерял $26 млн из-за ошибки копирования, случайно отправив 7 912 токенов Renzo restaked ETH (ezETH) на неверный адрес. Теперь он предлагает $2,5 млн за помощь в возврате средств.
19 июня трейдер вместо своего адреса вставил адрес модуля safe-контракта, что привело к блокировке токенов без возможности вывода. На вопрос о причине ошибки он ответил: «Ошибка копирования».
Он обратился к хакерам через социальную сеть X, надеясь найти специалиста, способного обнаружить уязвимость в смарт-контракте и вернуть заблокированные средства.
Криптотрейдер под псевдонимом qklpjeth потерял $26 млн из-за ошибки копирования, случайно отправив 7 912 токенов Renzo restaked ETH (ezETH) на неверный адрес. Теперь он предлагает $2,5 млн за помощь в возврате средств.
19 июня трейдер вместо своего адреса вставил адрес модуля safe-контракта, что привело к блокировке токенов без возможности вывода. На вопрос о причине ошибки он ответил: «Ошибка копирования».
Он обратился к хакерам через социальную сеть X, надеясь найти специалиста, способного обнаружить уязвимость в смарт-контракте и вернуть заблокированные средства.
Еще никогда сtrl-c+ctrl-v не была такой дорогой
BY Блохи в свитере
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Telegram users are able to send files of any type up to 2GB each and access them from any device, with no limit on cloud storage, which has made downloading files more popular on the platform. "Like the bombing of the maternity ward in Mariupol," he said, "Even before it hits the news, you see the videos on the Telegram channels." On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from tr