📜 در گزارش هجدهم دیده بان کسب و کار و گاهنامه مدیر نتایج بررسی ۱۵ ریسک کلان، ۱۵ ریسک صنعت منتشر شده است. 🔶 بازنشر این گزارش می تواند برای فعالان کسب و کار ارزش آفرین باشد
📜 در گزارش هجدهم دیده بان کسب و کار و گاهنامه مدیر نتایج بررسی ۱۵ ریسک کلان، ۱۵ ریسک صنعت منتشر شده است. 🔶 بازنشر این گزارش می تواند برای فعالان کسب و کار ارزش آفرین باشد
BY انجمن علمی دانشجویی کارآفرینی دانشگاه تهران
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
As the war in Ukraine rages, the messaging app Telegram has emerged as the go-to place for unfiltered live war updates for both Ukrainian refugees and increasingly isolated Russians alike. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from tr
