А вы знаете, кто и что есть на картине Питера Брейгеля «Поклонение волхвов»?
🟢 ребенок на покрытой льдом реке
🟢 полуразрушенный замок
🟢 тележное колесу в снегу
А о том, как они связаны и что означают, вы можете услышать на нашей лекции в Санкт-Петербурге. Вместе с доцентом РАНХиГС, автором лекционных курсов по творчеству Питера Брейгеля Михаилом Кукиным, пройдём по местам великой картины, которые ускользают от взгляда.
А вы знаете, кто и что есть на картине Питера Брейгеля «Поклонение волхвов»?
🟢 ребенок на покрытой льдом реке
🟢 полуразрушенный замок
🟢 тележное колесу в снегу
А о том, как они связаны и что означают, вы можете услышать на нашей лекции в Санкт-Петербурге. Вместе с доцентом РАНХиГС, автором лекционных курсов по творчеству Питера Брейгеля Михаилом Кукиным, пройдём по местам великой картины, которые ускользают от взгляда.
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from tr
