⚫️ تا وقتی اون #اپوزوسیون_فشل_درمانده ادامه میده این #اتاق_فکر_نیرومند_نوظهور هم ادامه میده ...
وقتی اپوزوسیون کاملا خودشو از درجه مشروعیت خارج کرد ... باز اون #اتاق_فکر_عوضی ادامه میده . یه جوری که اپوزوسیون فکر کنه : 👈 نیروهای اتاق فکر ؛ نیروهای خودشن . #همین_قدر_گاو
⚫️ تا وقتی اون #اپوزوسیون_فشل_درمانده ادامه میده این #اتاق_فکر_نیرومند_نوظهور هم ادامه میده ...
وقتی اپوزوسیون کاملا خودشو از درجه مشروعیت خارج کرد ... باز اون #اتاق_فکر_عوضی ادامه میده . یه جوری که اپوزوسیون فکر کنه : 👈 نیروهای اتاق فکر ؛ نیروهای خودشن . #همین_قدر_گاو
The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital. Under the Sebi Act, the regulator has the power to carry out search and seizure of books, registers, documents including electronics and digital devices from any person associated with the securities market.
from tr
