«Война и мир» (Театр имени Е. Вахтангова, режиссер Р. Туминас)
Сцены а-ля «Онегин» Туминаса: без дуэли, неба Аустерлица, дуба и Каратаева. Наташа-Лерман неотличима от ее же Татьяны: бегает и тягает мебель. Как и в ЕО, есть персонаж-смерть: тут это крутой лысый дядька. Максакова (в наряде из ЕО) чудесна. И замечательно хорош Болконский-Поляк.
«Война и мир» (Театр имени Е. Вахтангова, режиссер Р. Туминас)
Сцены а-ля «Онегин» Туминаса: без дуэли, неба Аустерлица, дуба и Каратаева. Наташа-Лерман неотличима от ее же Татьяны: бегает и тягает мебель. Как и в ЕО, есть персонаж-смерть: тут это крутой лысый дядька. Максакова (в наряде из ЕО) чудесна. И замечательно хорош Болконский-Поляк.
BY Князь Процент
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy."
from tr
