📉 Поспорили доктор (и депутат) Матвеев и доктор (и не депутат) Кричевский, мигранты ли обвалили рубль? Позволю себе «вклиниться в дискуссию» (по просьбе читателей) и поделиться своим особо ценным мнением.
P.S. А ещё мне не понятно, почему «защитника мигрантов» Кричевского именуют «либералом»? Кричевский входил в партию и баллотировался на выборах от социалистической партии «Справедливая Россия». Членов социалистических партий раньше было принято именовать «социалистами».
📉 Поспорили доктор (и депутат) Матвеев и доктор (и не депутат) Кричевский, мигранты ли обвалили рубль? Позволю себе «вклиниться в дискуссию» (по просьбе читателей) и поделиться своим особо ценным мнением.
P.S. А ещё мне не понятно, почему «защитника мигрантов» Кричевского именуют «либералом»? Кричевский входил в партию и баллотировался на выборах от социалистической партии «Справедливая Россия». Членов социалистических партий раньше было принято именовать «социалистами».
Since January 2022, the SC has received a total of 47 complaints and enquiries on illegal investment schemes promoted through Telegram. These fraudulent schemes offer non-existent investment opportunities, promising very attractive and risk-free returns within a short span of time. They commonly offer unrealistic returns of as high as 1,000% within 24 hours or even within a few hours. Telegram was founded in 2013 by two Russian brothers, Nikolai and Pavel Durov. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, an account on the Telegram messaging platform posing as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged his armed forces to surrender.
from tr
