گزیده ای از دو کتاب فایده گرایی #جان_استوارت_میل با ترجمه‌ی #دکتر_مردیها و #الفبای_فلسفه #نایجل_واربرتون و اندکی افزونه
➖ فایده گرایی در وهله‌ی اول نگاهی توصیفی ست ، مربوط به حقوق است و بنیادین ( کلی ) است. ➖ ضد فضیلت نیست ، بلکه برای فضایل اخلاقی توجیه عقلی و عینی فراهم میآورد. ➖جایگزین ناپذیر و گریزناپذیر ست.
ممکن‌ست مطالبی اضافه شود که در این صورت اطلاع رسانی می‌شود.
گزیده ای از دو کتاب فایده گرایی #جان_استوارت_میل با ترجمه‌ی #دکتر_مردیها و #الفبای_فلسفه #نایجل_واربرتون و اندکی افزونه
➖ فایده گرایی در وهله‌ی اول نگاهی توصیفی ست ، مربوط به حقوق است و بنیادین ( کلی ) است. ➖ ضد فضیلت نیست ، بلکه برای فضایل اخلاقی توجیه عقلی و عینی فراهم میآورد. ➖جایگزین ناپذیر و گریزناپذیر ست.
ممکن‌ست مطالبی اضافه شود که در این صورت اطلاع رسانی می‌شود.
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. The regulator said it has been undertaking several campaigns to educate the investors to be vigilant while taking investment decisions based on stock tips. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from tr
