Вид с коптера на первый уничтоженный британский танк Challenger 2 из состава 82-й ОДШБр ВСУ, а также на две сгоревшие БМП, бронетранспортер М113 и один пикап.
Сообщается, что танк был подбит расчетом ПТРК «Корнет». Фото от: @frontbird
Вид с коптера на первый уничтоженный британский танк Challenger 2 из состава 82-й ОДШБр ВСУ, а также на две сгоревшие БМП, бронетранспортер М113 и один пикап.
Сообщается, что танк был подбит расчетом ПТРК «Корнет». Фото от: @frontbird
But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences.
from tr
