Родственники и друзья активно интересуются тем, что можно подарить Андрюше на Новый год, поэтому, решила, что вишлисту все-таки быть. Мы с мужем тоже обязательно приготовим небольшой подарочек Андрею под елочку. Пусть он ещё маленький (напомню, сейчас Андрею 1.3), но мне хочется атмосферы праздника ✨
Родственники и друзья активно интересуются тем, что можно подарить Андрюше на Новый год, поэтому, решила, что вишлисту все-таки быть. Мы с мужем тоже обязательно приготовим небольшой подарочек Андрею под елочку. Пусть он ещё маленький (напомню, сейчас Андрею 1.3), но мне хочется атмосферы праздника ✨
In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation." Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. Perpetrators of these scams will create a public group on Telegram to promote these investment packages that are usually accompanied by fake testimonies and sometimes advertised as being Shariah-compliant. Interested investors will be asked to directly message the representatives to begin investing in the various investment packages offered. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from tr
