Категорически не могу понять, почему Луиджи Манджоне ставится в упрек его симпатичное лицо и богатство родителей. Не могу понять и удивлений, почему его героизируют, как будто вытесняя всю историю индивидуального террора в России и Америке, — историю, в которой все ясно: цель индивидуального террора — посеять страх среди власть имущих, занимающихся разграблением рабочего класса и крестьян. Не забывайте.
Категорически не могу понять, почему Луиджи Манджоне ставится в упрек его симпатичное лицо и богатство родителей. Не могу понять и удивлений, почему его героизируют, как будто вытесняя всю историю индивидуального террора в России и Америке, — историю, в которой все ясно: цель индивидуального террора — посеять страх среди власть имущих, занимающихся разграблением рабочего класса и крестьян. Не забывайте.
BY пошелнахуй.медиа
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." Perpetrators of such fraud use various marketing techniques to attract subscribers on their social media channels. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from tr
