Позволю себе дополнить. К сожалению, все так запущено, что рыбка задом не плывет. Но ситуация не безвыходна. Если в сходных случаях заинтересованные лица, не позорясь, сразу обратятся ко мне, я воззову к Высшим Силам, и думаю, они не откажут. Только чур, звонить напрямую, без посредников.
Позволю себе дополнить. К сожалению, все так запущено, что рыбка задом не плывет. Но ситуация не безвыходна. Если в сходных случаях заинтересованные лица, не позорясь, сразу обратятся ко мне, я воззову к Высшим Силам, и думаю, они не откажут. Только чур, звонить напрямую, без посредников.
BY Лев Вершинин
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety.
from tr
