После назначения на прошлой неделе и.о. ректором РГУ полковником-автомобилистом Игорем Мурогом подполковника-автомобилиста без ученой степени и исторического образования Геннадия Ларина руководителем научного исторического центра РГУ, исторический факультет вуза плачет до сих пор. Потоки воды льются с потолка деканата истфака. Что дальше?
После назначения на прошлой неделе и.о. ректором РГУ полковником-автомобилистом Игорем Мурогом подполковника-автомобилиста без ученой степени и исторического образования Геннадия Ларина руководителем научного исторического центра РГУ, исторический факультет вуза плачет до сих пор. Потоки воды льются с потолка деканата истфака. Что дальше?
"This time we received the coordinates of enemy vehicles marked 'V' in Kyiv region," it added. The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from tr
