Председатель ФНЕА Аслан Барциц публично озвучил ряд вопросов по которым со стороны прокуратуры не было соответствующей реакции.
"Мы можем обозначить массу вопросов к Генеральной прокуратуре. Мы, люди государственные, в случае необходимости можем лично сесть за стол с прокурором и обсудить список имеющихся у нас дел".
Председатель ФНЕА Аслан Барциц публично озвучил ряд вопросов по которым со стороны прокуратуры не было соответствующей реакции.
"Мы можем обозначить массу вопросов к Генеральной прокуратуре. Мы, люди государственные, в случае необходимости можем лично сесть за стол с прокурором и обсудить список имеющихся у нас дел".
BY RESPUBLICA / РЕСПУБЛИКА
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows.
from tr
