Политолог Семёнов объяснил Путину причины низкой рождаемости в Рязанской области. Это низкая доля молодёжи, её трудовая миграция в столичную агломерацию, высокие цены на жильё относительно доходов. Плюс высокий уровень разводов, особенности концентрации богатства, коэффициента Джини и структуры экономики. Ну вот и всё. 🤷♂️ @SemenovCons
Политолог Семёнов объяснил Путину причины низкой рождаемости в Рязанской области. Это низкая доля молодёжи, её трудовая миграция в столичную агломерацию, высокие цены на жильё относительно доходов. Плюс высокий уровень разводов, особенности концентрации богатства, коэффициента Джини и структуры экономики. Ну вот и всё. 🤷♂️ @SemenovCons
BY РЯЗИНФОРМБЮРО
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. Telegram was co-founded by Pavel and Nikolai Durov, the brothers who had previously created VKontakte. VK is Russia’s equivalent of Facebook, a social network used for public and private messaging, audio and video sharing as well as online gaming. In January, SimpleWeb reported that VK was Russia’s fourth most-visited website, after Yandex, YouTube and Google’s Russian-language homepage. In 2016, Forbes’ Michael Solomon described Pavel Durov (pictured, below) as the “Mark Zuckerberg of Russia.” On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from tr
