Мэр Анивского городского округа Артем Лазарев пошел на амбразуру. Чиновник ответил жительнице села Таранай, которая просила президента России Владимира Путина ускорить ремонт дороги Анива — Таранай.
Так вот Лазарев написал в комментариях под постом у девушки, что «дорогу передали в областную собственность, ждём ремонта! Сделают. И проект на реконструкцию готов». Сроков градоначальник не сообщил. По ситуации также молчат и региональные власти.
Мэр Анивского городского округа Артем Лазарев пошел на амбразуру. Чиновник ответил жительнице села Таранай, которая просила президента России Владимира Путина ускорить ремонт дороги Анива — Таранай.
Так вот Лазарев написал в комментариях под постом у девушки, что «дорогу передали в областную собственность, ждём ремонта! Сделают. И проект на реконструкцию готов». Сроков градоначальник не сообщил. По ситуации также молчат и региональные власти.
Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp.
from tr
