В Йошкар-Оле прошли одиночные пикеты против замены американского препарата от муковисцидоза
Родители детей с муковисцидозом, обеспокоенные заменой хорошо зарекомендовавшего себя американского препарата «Трикафта» на непроверенный аргентинский аналог, вновь вышли в одиночные пикеты к зданиям городской и областной администраций в Йошкар-Оле.
«Жизнь наших детей под угрозой! Мы хотим, чтобы наши дети получали безопасные, эффективные препараты! Трикафта вытянула моего ребенка с того света, и я ни за что не променяю этот шанс на светлое будущее на контрафакт без доказательной базы!», — написала одна из родительниц.
В Йошкар-Оле прошли одиночные пикеты против замены американского препарата от муковисцидоза
Родители детей с муковисцидозом, обеспокоенные заменой хорошо зарекомендовавшего себя американского препарата «Трикафта» на непроверенный аргентинский аналог, вновь вышли в одиночные пикеты к зданиям городской и областной администраций в Йошкар-Оле.
«Жизнь наших детей под угрозой! Мы хотим, чтобы наши дети получали безопасные, эффективные препараты! Трикафта вытянула моего ребенка с того света, и я ни за что не променяю этот шанс на светлое будущее на контрафакт без доказательной базы!», — написала одна из родительниц.
Markets continued to grapple with the economic and corporate earnings implications relating to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. “We have a ton of uncertainty right now,” said Stephanie Link, chief investment strategist and portfolio manager at Hightower Advisors. “We’re dealing with a war, we’re dealing with inflation. We don’t know what it means to earnings.” On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough
from tr
