Друзья! Мы начинаем общегородской сбор подписей под требованием лишить Эйфмана Б.Я. звания Почетный гражданин Санкт-Петербурга. Разрушителям памятников нет места в книге славы нашего города. Отныне его имя навсегда будет вписано в другую книгу - книгу позора!
Будем собирать подписи не только у Дома Басевича, но и по всей Петроградской стороне, по всему городу. Кто готов постоять завтра, в пятницу или на выходных - отпишитесь в комментариях или в лс @mukhin_oleg. Мы с вами сделаем так, что о подлости его узнает весь город!
Друзья! Мы начинаем общегородской сбор подписей под требованием лишить Эйфмана Б.Я. звания Почетный гражданин Санкт-Петербурга. Разрушителям памятников нет места в книге славы нашего города. Отныне его имя навсегда будет вписано в другую книгу - книгу позора!
Будем собирать подписи не только у Дома Басевича, но и по всей Петроградской стороне, по всему городу. Кто готов постоять завтра, в пятницу или на выходных - отпишитесь в комментариях или в лс @mukhin_oleg. Мы с вами сделаем так, что о подлости его узнает весь город!
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides.
from tr
