🖊В подмосковном Одинцово совершено покушение на бывшего зампредседателя правительства Ингушетии Шерипа Аликхаджиева, сообщили «Ъ» в СКР. Неизвестный мужчина выстрелил в него четыре раза. Господин Аликхаджиев госпитализирован. Он находится в реанимации.
🖊В подмосковном Одинцово совершено покушение на бывшего зампредседателя правительства Ингушетии Шерипа Аликхаджиева, сообщили «Ъ» в СКР. Неизвестный мужчина выстрелил в него четыре раза. Господин Аликхаджиев госпитализирован. Он находится в реанимации.
BY СОСЕДИ | Большой Кавказ
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Again, in contrast to Facebook, Google and Twitter, Telegram's founder Pavel Durov runs his company in relative secrecy from Dubai. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy."
from tr
