Очень рекомендую интервью Сергея Рябкова https://www.interfax.ru/interview/990928 Вот журналисты задают одни и те же вопросы, и столько у всех разных сомнений и версий (нормально). Но вот это интервью - настолько конкретное, что я даже не знаю, как можно сказать еще конкретней о российско-американских отношениях и ожиданиях в отношении Трампа. Конечно, МИД нынче не тот, и решают все всё в других кабинетах, но если пойдет диалог, то и МИД еще о себе заявит.
Очень рекомендую интервью Сергея Рябкова https://www.interfax.ru/interview/990928 Вот журналисты задают одни и те же вопросы, и столько у всех разных сомнений и версий (нормально). Но вот это интервью - настолько конкретное, что я даже не знаю, как можно сказать еще конкретней о российско-американских отношениях и ожиданиях в отношении Трампа. Конечно, МИД нынче не тот, и решают все всё в других кабинетах, но если пойдет диалог, то и МИД еще о себе заявит.
He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from tr
