Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 9178 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Семен Уралов | Telegram Webview: su2050/3975 -
Тема: Социология постУкраины - о чем говорят данные группы "Рейтинг" и для чего их нам демонстрируют. Тема: Девиантологический разбор отечественного фильма "Непослушник".
Тема: Социология постУкраины - о чем говорят данные группы "Рейтинг" и для чего их нам демонстрируют. Тема: Девиантологический разбор отечественного фильма "Непослушник".
Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Sebi said data, emails and other documents are being retrieved from the seized devices and detailed investigation is in progress. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from tr
