В России хотят ввести уголовное наказание за оскорбление чиновников, в том числе и в интернете
Комитет Госдумы по безопасности и противодействию коррупции предлагает ужесточить наказание за публичное оскорбление представителя власти. Правительство уже поддержало инициативу.
Так, наказывать предлагают общественными работами до 460 часов или исправительными работами на срок до 2 лет. Также предусматривается штраф до 80 тысяч рублей.
А вот за оскорбления в Сети в отношении чиновников может грозить штраф до 1 млн рублей с лишением права занимать определенные должности до 3 лет, обязательные работы до 480 часов, принудительные работы до 2 лет или лишение свободы на срок до 2 лет.
В России хотят ввести уголовное наказание за оскорбление чиновников, в том числе и в интернете
Комитет Госдумы по безопасности и противодействию коррупции предлагает ужесточить наказание за публичное оскорбление представителя власти. Правительство уже поддержало инициативу.
Так, наказывать предлагают общественными работами до 460 часов или исправительными работами на срок до 2 лет. Также предусматривается штраф до 80 тысяч рублей.
А вот за оскорбления в Сети в отношении чиновников может грозить штраф до 1 млн рублей с лишением права занимать определенные должности до 3 лет, обязательные работы до 480 часов, принудительные работы до 2 лет или лишение свободы на срок до 2 лет.
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Some people used the platform to organize ahead of the storming of the U.S. Capitol in January 2021, and last month Senator Mark Warner sent a letter to Durov urging him to curb Russian information operations on Telegram. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Telegram users are able to send files of any type up to 2GB each and access them from any device, with no limit on cloud storage, which has made downloading files more popular on the platform. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from tr
